Step 1: if you make any claims,
then back them up with citations
--citeless claim:
"Its been proven and can also be physically seen that violence learned by
children and subjected to children can also have effects on that child's
family."; "Children raised in high crime areas are often encouraged
to rise above the standard of people from their particular area.";
"Children are generally easily influenced creatures and will take things
in as they are seen, rather than thinking them out or questioning them.";
"There are many forms of deviancy, but the most common among our community
is crime."
--Answer the question, "According to whom has it been proven?" "Who made this claim?"
– You can only say with the data (i.e., evidence) or text allow you to say. So be able to answer the question, "Which data allow you to make this claim?"
– You can only say with the data (i.e., evidence) or text allow you to say. So be able to answer the question, "Which data allow you to make this claim?"
--If I say that gender is at least partially produced by the
speech of those directed at a body to be gendered (e.g., the “genderless
baby”), then I need to show in the data or in the existing theory support for
this claim.
Step 2: avoid speculation or guessing without data
– E.g., "Although it is alive and well in all walks of life, I do believe it doesn't effect children in all walks of life the same. A murder, for instance, committed in a high-class neighborhood with a low crime rate witnessed by a child of that neighborhood surely couldn't have the same effect on a child in that same scenario except it occurring in a crime-rich environment... could it?"
– E.g., "Although it is alive and well in all walks of life, I do believe it doesn't effect children in all walks of life the same. A murder, for instance, committed in a high-class neighborhood with a low crime rate witnessed by a child of that neighborhood surely couldn't have the same effect on a child in that same scenario except it occurring in a crime-rich environment... could it?"
--The question asked in this example is actually a good
possible starting point for a specific question or hypothesis. A starting point not a stopping point. It is characteristic more of a 1st draft than a final draft.
Step 3: avoid flourish
--e.g., "That statement couldn't be more true."
Step 4: avoid quotations and drawn out citations
– E.g., "David Croteau and William Hoynes says "Crime exists in all societies," in the book "Experince Sociology.""
– Alternative example: "If it is true that crime is found in every society (ES, 12), then..."
– E.g., "David Croteau and William Hoynes says "Crime exists in all societies," in the book "Experince Sociology.""
– Alternative example: "If it is true that crime is found in every society (ES, 12), then..."
--[for controversy analysis]--
Step 5: Use the native idiom
-- try to use the language of the people observed, particularly if they name their side or describe their perspective (e.g., "Pro-choice" or "pro-life")
-- try to use the language of the people observed, particularly if they name their side or describe their perspective (e.g., "Pro-choice" or "pro-life")
No comments:
Post a Comment